Six case-led scenes connect selected course concepts to evidence, calculation, judgment, and controls.
Read lesson transcript
Start with the financial purpose
A proposed life case requests $8 million, but the file does not explain the financial purpose. Before weighing medical evidence, reconcile income, assets, liabilities, ownership, existing coverage, and the intended beneficiary need. A large face amount is not automatically unsuitable, but it needs a coherent, documented rationale. If the purpose remains unclear, obtain targeted information and keep the decision open rather than treating size alone as a risk class.
Assess impairments together
An applicant has two individually mild impairments, but their combined effect on function or mortality is uncertain. Do not mechanically add two standard table ratings: the interaction may be neutral, additive, or more serious, depending on evidence and the carrier’s method. Review chronology, treatment, severity, and relevant clinical opinions. State what is known about each condition and what additional evidence is needed to assess their joint effect.
Check treaty capacity before offering
The requested amount is $2 million, while the stated automatic retention is $1 million. That difference signals a need to verify treaty terms and whether facultative consideration is available; it does not establish that another $1 million will be accepted. Confirm limits, exclusions, submission requirements, and timing with the authorized reinsurance team. Avoid promising a final offer until capacity and terms are confirmed.
Reconcile conflicting clinical evidence
A physician summary describes a normal ECG, while the tracing report notes an abnormality. Neither statement should be selected simply because it is convenient. Confirm the dates and source documents, ask an appropriate clinician to clarify the discrepancy, and assess whether the finding changes the risk. Keep the file’s evidence trail clear so the underwriter’s conclusion reflects the resolved record rather than an unexplained contradiction.
Interpret laboratory results in context
One laboratory result falls outside its reference range. That flags a question, not a standalone prognosis. Consider the degree of deviation, repeat values, trend, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and related findings under the applicable underwriting guide. A borderline isolated result may be less significant than a persistent trend with corroborating evidence. Request only information that can resolve the decision, and document how it changes the assessment.
FALU extends the AALU foundation
FALU requires the AALU foundation, ALU 301, and three fellowship electives under the published requirements. This advanced level asks the underwriter to integrate complex medical evidence, large-case financial justification, and reinsurance capacity. The examples here illustrate selected decisions; they do not cover the entire syllabus. The standard remains disciplined reasoning: explain the evidence, its interaction, and the authority for the final action.