Six case-led scenes connect selected course concepts to evidence, calculation, judgment, and controls.
Read lesson transcript
Test the exclusion wording
A claimant has a prior diagnosis, then submits a disability claim after a new injury. The policy contains a pre-existing-condition exclusion. A diagnosis alone does not establish that the exclusion applies: read its exact wording, applicable look-back period, and causal test, then compare those terms with the medical timeline. Separate what the contract requires from what the file proves, and explain any unresolved evidence before deciding.
Pin down when coverage began
An application and initial premium were received March 4; the policy was issued March 12, and a loss occurred March 8. Do not assume either date automatically controls. Check the conditional receipt, underwriting requirements, policy terms, and chronology of the event. Determine whether coverage attached under those terms and document the basis. This date analysis can decide whether the claim falls within coverage before benefit details are considered.
Count an elimination period carefully
A contract has a 30-day elimination period. The claimant is disabled for 24 days, returns to work, then has another 12-day period. Do not simply add the days and assume eligibility. Check whether the contract requires continuous disability, allows recurrent periods to combine, and sets a recurrence window. Apply those rules to the dates, then distinguish the elimination period from the payable-benefit start date.
Compare duties under the definition
A surgeon cannot perform operating duties but can do desk-based work. Under an own-occupation definition, ask whether the claimant can perform the material duties of the insured occupation, subject to the policy wording. Under an any-occupation definition, the test may differ. Do not substitute a general ability-to-work judgment for the contract’s definition; identify duties, restrictions, and the applicable test before calculating benefits.
Authenticate beneficiary changes
Two beneficiary forms conflict. One is older; the later form appears signed, but its receipt date and completeness are unclear. Before paying, establish which designation was valid under the policy and applicable procedures. Verify authentication, required signatures, receipt timing, and any competing legal direction. Preserve the record and explain the review. A plausible later document is not enough if the contract’s change requirements were not met.
Use the ALHC course foundation
The ALHC designation combines introductory insurance and operations courses with four claim-focused courses covering medical knowledge, law, claim administration, and management. These scenes sample several decision points; they do not represent the full curriculum. The shared discipline is to connect the governing contract, reliable evidence, and a clear calculation. When facts conflict, investigate the material issue and preserve a reviewable explanation for the claimant and the organization.